DNA and proteins: Which come first?

Proteins require DNA to be formed because DNA provides the instruction codes for amino acids to be sequenced correctly to form proteins. However, DNA by itself is useless unless there is already-existing protein. We have a chicken and egg situation. One cannot come before the other. They must both come together at once.

Here’s how to quickly and definitively refute the theory of evolution. It’s simply a fact that life cannot exist without proteins. Proteins are essential to every cell’s function and existence. However, proteins require DNA to be formed. That’s because proteins are chains of specifically-sequenced amino acids. Amino acids must link up in the precise sequence for a protein to form. The precise sequence of amino acids which is essential to protein formation is itself determined by the precise arrangement of the bases in the DNA molecule. That means that the precise arrangement of the bases in the DNA molecule constitutes the code for the precise arrangement of amino acids in a chain. And the precise amino acid arrangement in a chain is itself necessary for protein formation. Therefore, to put it simply: To have life, you must have DNA; a protein cannot form without it. But DNA by itself is useless. It can’t do anything.  DNA doesn’t go anywhere or do anything productive without already existing proteins. That’s because in order for DNA to be transcribed and utilized in the cell, which is essential to protein formation and life, DNA requires already existing proteins. DNA also cannot even replicate, that is make a copy of itself, without already existing proteins. Think about that. It means that if you began with DNA but without proteins, you could never get to proteins or life because DNA needs already existing proteins to even function or form proteins. And you couldn’t start with proteins which are devoid of DNA because proteins can only be formed from the instructions and information in DNA. That proves that both DNA and proteins, not to mention the many other molecular machines that enable them to interact, must have been present from the beginning of life. One could not have evolved into the other because they require one another for sustenance and utility. They must have been and were created simultaneously.

Evolution is false. Charles Darwin – the man who came up with the theory of evolution, admitted “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” We’ve just discussed a fact which proves without any doubt that such a structure exists. There are countless other examples. They are ubiquitous in creation. Evolution is a completely unscientific hoax and fairytale. It’s simply a false religious worldview that has been imposed upon the masses through the education system and by means of lies and hoaxes such as the Piltdown Man. True science such as the fact that we’ve just discussed refutes it and that is clear to those who actually want the truth. But that’s the key isn’t it. Most people don’t want the truth. In fact only a very spiritually darkened generation could have come to embrace evolution and failed to perceive the utter stupidity and illogic inherent in the idea at every turn. And the reason that so many colleges and universities decide to swiftly silence, remove or intimidate scientists who simply look into the arguments against evolution and begin to speak about them is that the evolution hoax cannot withstand on a scrutiny.