This One Plant PROVES God’s Existence

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sF9pgMHaI0g Can you think of a plant that proves God's existence? If you watch the venus flytrap videos online, you'll find a number of them showing flies getting caught and eaten by this plant but few give details about the amazing design of the plant, let alone give credit to the designer. The famous evolutionary believer and commentator David Attenborough tells us how it all began. “It began in the sea some 3000 million years ago. Complex chemical molecules began to clump together to form microscopic blobs.” And this first blob, thanks to a magical 3,000 million years of time, evolved into this incredibly complex life as we know it, not only evolving into you and I but also into the amazing venus flight trap. Listen now to David Attenborough…
Read More

Stanley Miller Urey Experiment

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHk_93Wn-ZU Chemicals somehow got together and made living things, this is often called spontaneous generation. There have been some enormous problems faced in trying to get a group of chemicals to come to life. A few years ago, Stanley Miller did a famous experiment. He took some simple materials - some methane, some ammonia, some water vapor, introduced an electric spark to simulate lightning flashing back and forth in the atmosphere of the ancient earth. In just a week you got amino acids, the building blocks of protein. That was hailed as almost making life in a test tube. That was one I used when I used to teach evolution but I took a look at the rest of the evidence and there are three problems with that brilliant experiment.…
Read More

Irreducible complexity, bacterial flagellum and the Type III Secretory System

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G581HlqXSFg Some of the proponents of neo-darwinism have cited the type 3 secretory system as the aboriginal system from which the entire flagellum might have arisen through a gradual evolutionary process. The reason they cite the type 3 secretory system as a possible ancestor to the flagellum is that the structure of this roughly 10-part secretory apparatus does play a part in the flagellum itself during the assembly of the flagellum and it ends up also hanging around as part of the structure of the flagellum. To build a flagellum, you need a lot more than a type 3 secretory system or anything similar to it, but people have suggested that this is the ancestral form upon which all the other parts were added to build a full flagellum. They've…
Read More

Co-Option

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-Z-eYaiqDs When we talk about the irreducible complexity of the human eye or the bacterial flagellar motor, I get all these comments that just say “That's bogus” because science has disproved the argument for irreducible complexity over the last decade. It's been proven in a court of law - the Dover trials - and therefore I am clinging to some argument for irreducible complexity that has been proven wrong by mainstream science and there's nothing else that's tossed out. But if you dig in, it's based on this notion of co-option and the co-option theory basically says that when we take the bacterial flagellar motor, there were simpler motors that had protein parts in them that were co-opted by more complex motors at the organic level later.  The bacterial flagellar…
Read More

Irreducible Complexity (Kenneth R. Miller cross-examines Michael J. Behe)

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HBTbDNeKLY Michael, I'd like to start out by pouncing upon the notion of irreducible complexity, which is a point that you make again in your book Darwin's Black Box. On page 43 of this book, you use a mousetrap as an example of irreducible complexity. You point out that a mousetrap has five parts and like a biochemical system, you claim that if you take one of those parts away, it won't work anymore. The five parts include the base, the spring, the clapper, which does the business and catch, and a little piece to hold the bait, and I have a working mouse trap here. I have here another trap for which I have removed a part, I've taken away the trigger. According to Dr Behe’s analogy of the…
Read More

Behe Destroys Ken Miller’s Challenge to Flagellum Motor

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSvRhjkk9jM I would submit, as a preliminary, that there has been no Darwinian progress on explaining molecular machinery and that all of the stuff that has been alluded to and much more is actually just regular biochemistry, which is being spun in a Darwinian fashion. Let me start with the bacterial flagellum and the type 3 secretory system-  the idea which has been popularized by Ken Miller - is that perhaps this type 3 secretory system, which is actually just a little injection apparatus, could have been a precursor to the bacterial flagellum, which is in fact a rotary motor. To get across the problem with that, I'm going to start with a cartoon example that I started with, and Ken Miller picked up on. I started to illustrate the…
Read More

Does Richard Dawkins believe in Intelligent Design?

Intelligent Design
https://youtu.be/prFZTMIKOi4 If you look at the details of biochemistry molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer. In biology, I suppose it would have to be the double-helix Watson and Crick discovery of the structure of DNA which was far more than just the discovery the crystallographic work, discovering the structure all of a big molecule because what that led up to was a major revolution in which much of biology became a sort of branch of information technology. The consequence of the Watson-Crick discovery, with all that it led on to, the DNA code and the sort of various genome projects that are going on now is that genes, which from my point of view are absolutely central to biology, genes are information. They're coded…
Read More

Scientists Speak Out About Evidence of Intelligent Design in Nature

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEps6lzWUKk&t=1s As a scientist,, microbiologist, biochemist, as a geologist, neuroscientist, physician, biologist and an engineer, I think there is overwhelming evidence for intelligent design in nature. I see intelligent design in the history of life, in the genetic code of life, in the molecular machines inside our cells. In the complexity of life, in the information embedded in living things, in the operation of the human brain and the features of the human body, in the chicken and egg causal circularity of life. As a mathematician, I see great evidence of purpose in the universe. As a molecular biologist I see evidence for design everywhere I look pretty much. Nature is incomprehensible without inference to purpose and to intelligent design.  The properties of the universe as a whole and our…
Read More

What does Richard Dawkins think about Intelligent Design?

Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8 Well then who did create the heavens and the earth? Why do you use the word “who”? You see immediately beg the question by using the word “who”. Well then how did it get created? Well, by a very slow process. Well how did it start? Nobody knows how it got started. We know the kind of event it must have been. We know the sort of event that must have happened for the origin of life. What was that? It was the origin of the first self-replicating molecule.  Right, now how did that happen? I’ve told you we don't know. So you have no idea how it started? No, nor has anyone else. What do you think is the possibility that intelligent design might turn out to be…
Read More

Is Intelligent Design a defeated argument?

Intelligent Design
In October 2004, the Dover Area School District of York County, Pennsylvania, changed its biology teaching curriculum to require that intelligent design be presented as an alternative to evolution theory, and that Of Pandas and People, a textbook advocating intelligent design, was to be used as a reference book. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (Source: Wikipedia) The truth about the Dover Intelligent Design Trial https://youtu.be/UYcpzZF7LVo If you want the truth about the Dover intelligent design trial, don't count on getting it from PBS's program Judgment Day Intelligent Design on Trial. Their Nova show will likely spend a lot of time trying to build a…
Read More